4.5 Article

Gold nanoparticles based solid-phase microextraction coatings for determining organochlorine pesticides in aqueous environmental samples

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 40, Issue 9, Pages 2009-2021

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201700046

Keywords

environmental water analysis; gold nanoparticles; organochlorine pesticides; solid-phase microextraction

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [MAT2014-57465-R]
  2. Fundacion CajaCanarias [SPDs-Agua05]
  3. FPI PhD research contract [MAT2014-57465-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of solid-phase microextraction coatings based on gold nanoparticles was investigated, focusing the attention on the preparation of nanoparticles with nonclassical reduction agents of HAuCl4 such as gallic acid and H2O2, rather than the conventional sodium citrate. All nanoparticles were characterized by diode array spectroscopy, whereas novel nanoparticles prepared with gallic acid and H2O2 were also characterized by microscopic techniques. Solid-phase microextraction coatings were prepared with a layer-by-layer approach. Gallic acid permitted the preparation of stable nanoparticles with milder experimental conditions (1 min, room temperature) and provided the most uniform coatings (thickness similar to 3 mu m). Seven organochlorine pesticides were determined in different environmental waters using gas chromatography with electron capture detection. Despite the low thickness of the coatings, limits of detection of the entire method down to 0.13 mu g/L were obtained. A comparison with the commercial polyacrylate in terms of the partition coefficients of the analytes to the coatings gave logarithm of the partition coefficient values two times higher with gallic acid than polyacrylate (although the commercial fiber is 28 times thicker). Interfiber relative standard deviation values ranged from 8.67 to 21.3%. Optimum fibers also presented an adequate lifetime (>100 extractions).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available