4.5 Article

Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry for the determination of phthalates preconcentrated by microextraction based on an ionic liquid

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 1310-1317

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201601173

Keywords

gas chromatography with mass spectrometry; ionic liquids; liquid-liquid microextraction; phthalate esters; thermal desorption

Funding

  1. Comunidad Autonoma de la Region de Murcia (Fundacion Seneca) [19888/GERM/15]
  2. Spanish MINECO [CTQ201568049-R]
  3. European Commission (FEDER/ERDF)
  4. University of Murcia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new procedure is proposed for the analysis of migration test solutions obtained from plastic bottles used in the packaging of edible oils. Ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction with ionic liquids was applied for the precon-centration of six phthalate esters: dimethylphthalate, diethylphthalate, di-n-butylphthalate, n-butylbenzylphthalate, di-2-ethylhexylphthalate, and di-n-octylphthalate. The enriched ionic liquid was directly analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry using direct insert microvial thermal desorption. The different factors affecting the microextraction efficiency, such as volume of the extracting phase (30 mu L of the ionic liquid) and ultrasound application time (25 s), and the thermal desorption step, such as desorption temperature and time, and gas flow rate, were studied. Under the selected conditions, detection limits for the analytes were in the 0.012-0.18 mu g/L range, while recovery assays provided values ranging from 80 to 112%. The use of butyl benzoate as internal standard increased the reproducibility of the analytical procedure. When the release of the six phthalate esters from the tested plastic bottles to liquid simulants was monitored using the optimized procedure, analyte concentrations of between 1.0 and 273 mu g/L were detected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available