4.1 Article

A first-order seismotectonic regionalization of Mexico for seismic hazard and risk estimation

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1295-1322

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-017-9666-0

Keywords

Seismic hazard; Seismic risk; Seismic regionalization; Seismicity; Mexico; Tectonics

Funding

  1. Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) [082821]
  2. [UNAM-PAPIIT 108115]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this work is to define a seismic regionalization of Mexico for seismic hazard and risk analyses. This seismic regionalization is based on seismic, geologic, and tectonic characteristics. To this end, a seismic catalog was compiled using the more reliable sources available. The catalog was made homogeneous in magnitude in order to avoid the differences in the way this parameter is reported by various agencies. Instead of using a linear regression to converts from m (b) and M (d) to M (s) or M (w) , using only events for which estimates of both magnitudes are available (i.e., paired data), we used the frequency-magnitude relations relying on the a and b values of the Gutenberg-Richter relation. The seismic regions are divided into three main categories: seismicity associated with the subduction process along the Pacific coast of Mexico, in-slab events within the down-going COC and RIV plates, and crustal seismicity associated to various geologic and tectonic regions. In total, 18 seismic regions were identified and delimited. For each, the a and b values of the Gutenberg-Richter relation were determined using a maximum likelihood estimation. The a and b parameters were repeatedly estimated as a function of time for each region, in order to confirm their reliability and stability. The recurrence times predicted by the resulting Gutenberg-Richter relations obtained are compared with the observed recurrence times of the larger events in each region of both historical and instrumental earthquakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available