Journal
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 546-560Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-017-9699-8
Keywords
Virtual science labs; Remote science labs; Alternative learning spaces; Laboratory learning outcomes; Online science education
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper further characterizes recently reviewed literature related to student learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) science labs, as well as factors to consider when evaluating the state and progress of research in this field as a whole. Current research is characterized according to (1) participant nationality and culture, (2) participant education level, (3) participant demography, (4) scientific discipline, and (5) research methodology, which could provide avenues for further research and useful dialog regarding the measurement and interpretation of data related to student learning outcome achievement in, and thus the efficacy of, non-traditional versus traditional science labs. Current research is also characterized by (6) research publication media and (7) availability of non-traditional labs used, which demonstrate some of the obstacles to progress and consensus in this research field.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available