4.6 Article

Epidemiology of injuries in Australian school level rugby union

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 740-744

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.03.006

Keywords

Sport injury; Concussion; Surveillance; Youth; Adolescent

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: There is a high incidence of injuries in rugby union due to the physical nature of the game. There is a lack of large-scale injury surveillance data reported for school level rugby players of different ages. Our study aimed to investigate the frequency and nature of injuries being sustained during an Australian school level rugby union season. Design: Prospective observational study. Methods: Injury surveillance was conducted on 3585 rugby players from all 8 schools participating in an interschool rugby competition in Queensland, Australia. Match injury data were collected using paper based injury recording forms during the season using a 'medical-attention' injury definition for each age group from opens (17 and 18 year olds) through to year 5 teams (9-10 year olds). Results: There were 332 injuries recorded over 14,029 player hours during the season. The overall rate of injury was 23.7/1000 player hours (95% CI, 21.2-26.3). The incidence of upper and lower limb injuries were 6.3 and 5.6 injuries/1000 player hours respectively (95% CI, 5.1-7.8 and 4.5-7.0). The incidence of suspected concussion injuries was 4.3/1000 player hours (95% CI, 3.6-5.5). Injuries differed across age groups and tackling was the most common mechanism of injury. Conclusions: The injury patterns observed in this large sample of players could be used to guide injury prevention programs in school level rugby union. Injury prevention programs should include age appropriate interventions and focus on improving the techniques used during the contact phase of rugby. (C) 2017 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available