3.8 Proceedings Paper

Temporal Enhanced Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography for Tissue Classification in Cancer Interventions: An experimental evaluation

Publisher

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.2514103

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional B-mode ultrasound imaging lacks soft tissue contrast to differentiate various tissue types. Emerging ultrasound imaging technologies have therefore focused on extracting tissue parameters important for tissue differentiation such as scatterer size, tissue elasticity, and micro-vasculatures. Among these technologies, shear wave elastography (SWE) is an approach that measures tissue viscoelastic parameters. Our group has proposed Temporal Enhanced Ultrasound (TeUS) that differentiates tissue types without requiring any external stimuli. Through analytical derivations and simulations, we previously showed that the source of tissue typing information in TeUS is physiological micro-vibrations resulting mainly from perfusion. We further demonstrated that TeUS is sensitive to the size and distributions of scatterers in the tissue, as well as its visco-elasticity. In this paper, we designed ultrasound phantoms to mimic tissue with two different elasticities and two scatterer sizes. A flexible microtube was embedded in the phantoms to generate local micro-vibrations. We experimentally demonstrate the relationship between TeUS and SWE and their sensitivity to tissue elasticity and scatterer size. This work indicated that while shear wave measurements are sensitive to the phantoms' viscoelasticity, they are not sensitive to ultrasound scatterer size. On the contrary, the TeUS amplitude depends on both scatterer size and tissue viscoelasticity. This work could potentially inform clinicians of choosing imaging modalities and interventions based on each cancer's unique traits and properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available