4.6 Article

Marketing sustainable tourism: the role of value orientation, well-being and credibility

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 1663-1685

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1650750

Keywords

Communication effects; consumer attitudes; multigroup structural equation modeling; positive emotions; sustainability label

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [S-64307-03-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marketing for sustainable tourism primarily attracts customers with a biospheric-altruistic value orientation. To reach a broader consumer group and also persuade people with a self-enhancement orientation to book sustainable hotels, the effectiveness of three different communication styles (emotionality levels, amount of sustainability information and inclusion of a label) is investigated, considering the consumer's value orientation. An experiment with 337 participants was conducted to analyze the effects of communication on consumer perceptions of well-being and credibility. Multigroup structural equation modeling was used to compare the impacts of communication style on participant's attitude toward booking a sustainable hotel, mediated by well-being and credibility. The results highlight significantly different communication effects among the two contrasting target groups. Consumers who are highly interested in sustainability (biospheric-altruistic value orientation) are persuaded by messages that include details about the hotel's sustainability performance, in order to increase the social-environmental well-being, whereas for customers who are less interested in sustainability (self-enhancement value orientation), a self-referential emotionally communication is essential, as it increases the emotional well-being. Inconsistent findings regarding the role of communication in raising the perception of credibility were obtained.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available