4.7 Article

Germinality does not necessarily define mAb expression and thermal stability

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 18, Pages 7505-7518

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-09998-3

Keywords

Recombinant antibody production; Difficult to express; Mammalian expression system; Secretory pathway; Germinalization

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  2. EQ-BOKU VIBT GmbH
  3. BOKU Core Facility for Biomolecular and Cellular Analysis
  4. PhD program BioToP (Biomolecular Technology of Proteins) - FWF [W1224]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production potential of recombinant monoclonal antibody (mAb) expressing cell lines depends, among other factors, on the intrinsic antibody structure determined by the amino acid sequence. In this study, we investigated the influence of somatic mutations in the V(D)J sequence of four individual, mature model mAbs on the expression potential. Therefore, we defined four couples, each consisting of one naturally occurring mAb (2G12, Ustekinumab, 4B3, and 2F5) and the corresponding germline-derived cognate mAb (353/11, 554/12, 136/63, and 236/14). For all eight mAb variants, recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines were developed with mAbs expressed from a defined chromosomal locus. The presented workflow investigates critical parameters including productivity, intra- and extracellular product profile, XBP1 splicing, thermal stability, and in silico hydrophobicity. Significant differences in productivity were even observed between the germline-derived mAbs which did not undergo somatic mutagenesis. Accordingly, back-to-germline mutations of mature mAbs are not necessarily reflecting improved expression and stability but indicate opportunities and limits of mAb engineering. From our studies, we conclude that germinalization represents a potential to improve mAb properties depending on the antibody's germline family, highlighting the fact that mAbs should be treated individually.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available