4.7 Article

The productive role of cognitive reappraisal in regulating affect during game-based learning

Journal

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
Volume 100, Issue -, Pages 358-369

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.002

Keywords

Affect; Frustration; Affective regulation; Cognitive reappraisal; Educational technology; Game-based learning

Funding

  1. U.S. Institution of Education Sciences (IES) [R305A170376]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted an exploratory study on affect regulation during game-based learning where 110 college-aged participants (M-age = 22.14, SDage = 1.24; 50.0% female; 70.0% White) played an easy, medium, and difficult level of an educational game (Physics Playground) while self-reporting their strongest affective state and regulation strategies associated with each level. Participants also self-reported their effort and completed a physics posttest after gameplay. We found that frustration, confusion, determination, and curiosity were the dominant affective states (81.4% of total reports) while cognitive reappraisal and acceptance were the major affective regulation strategies (others individually occurred less than 10.1% of the time). Engaging in cognitive reappraisal - an affective regulation strategy that involves changing the way one thinks about a situation - was beneficial for successfully solving a level when participants were frustrated or confused, but had no effect when participants were determined or curious. Engaging in cognitive reappraisal when experiencing high frustration/ confusion positively predicted posttest scores, but only for those who put a high amount of effort into the game. For students who were low in effort or low in frustration/confusion, simply accepting one's emotions when experiencing high frustration/confusion was beneficial. We discuss theoretical implications and applications towards game-based learning supports to promote persistence and learning outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available