3.8 Proceedings Paper

Adaptive matrix completion for the users and the items in tail

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3308558.3313736

Keywords

Recommender systems; Collaborative filtering; Matrix completion; Matrix factorization

Funding

  1. NSF [1447788, 1704074, 1757916, 1834251]
  2. Army Research Office [W911NF1810344]
  3. Intel Corp
  4. Digital Technology Center at the University of Minnesota
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1447788] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Materials Research
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1834251] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  10. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1704074, 1757916] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W911NF1810344] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recommender systems are widely used to recommend the most appealing items to users. These recommendations can be generated by applying collaborative filtering methods. The low-rank matrix completion method is the state-of-the-art collaborative filtering method. In this work, we show that the skewed distribution of ratings in the user-item rating matrix of real-world datasets affects the accuracy of matrix-completion-based approaches. Also, we show that the number of ratings that an item or a user has positively correlates with the ability of low-rank matrix-completion-based approaches to predict the ratings for the item or the user accurately. Furthermore, we use these insights to develop four matrix completion-based approaches, i.e., Frequency Adaptive Rating Prediction (FARP), Truncated Matrix Factorization (TMF), Truncated Matrix Factorization with Dropout (TMF + Dropout) and Inverse Frequency Weighted Matrix Factorization (IFWMF), that outperforms traditional matrix-completion-based approaches for the users and the items with few ratings in the user-item rating matrix.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available