4.7 Article

Expanding Proteome Coverage with CHarge Ordered Parallel Ion aNalysis (CHOPIN) Combined with Broad Specificity Proteolysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 1288-1299

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00915

Keywords

deep proteome; LC-MS/MS; sequence coverage; isoform profiling; protein sequence coverage

Funding

  1. Kennedy Trust Fund
  2. John Fell Fund [133/075]
  3. Welcome Trust [105605/Z/14/Z]
  4. Wellcome Trust [105605/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The deep proteome has been accessible by mass spectrometry for some time. However, the number of proteins identified in cells of the same type has plateaued at similar to 8000-10 000 without ID transfer from reference proteomes/data. Moreover, limited sequence coverage hampers the discrimination of protein isoforms when using trypsin as standard protease. Multienzyme approaches appear to improve sequence coverage and subsequent isoform discrimination. Here we expanded proteome and protein sequence coverage in MCF-7 breast cancer cells to an as yet unmatched depth by employing a work-flow that addresses current limitations in deep proteome analysis in multiple stages: We used (i) gel-aided sample preparation (GASP) and combined trypsin/elastase digests to increase peptide orthogonality, (ii) concatenated high-pH prefractionation, and (iii) CHarge Ordered Parallel Ion aNalysis (CHOPIN), available on an Orbitrap Fusion (Lumos) mass spectrometer, to achieve 57% median protein sequence coverage in 13 728 protein groups (8949 Unigene IDs) in a single cell line. CHOPIN allows the use of both detectors in the Orbitrap on predefined precursor types that optimizes parallel ion processing, leading to the identification of a total of 179 549 unique peptides covering the deep proteome in unprecedented detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available