4.7 Article

Evaluation of Parameters for Confident Phosphorylation Site Localization Using an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid Mass Spectrometer

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 3448-3459

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00337

Keywords

mass spectrometry; phosphoproteomics; phosphosite localization; phosphorylation site; Orbitrap Fusion; ptmRS; PTM-score; MASCOT; Andromeda; EThcD

Funding

  1. NorthWest Cancer Research [CR1088]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/L009501/1, BB/M025705/1]
  3. BBSRC DTP Ph.D. studentship award
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M012557/1, BB/L005239/1, BB/L009501/1, BB/M023818/1, BB/M025705/1, 1510759] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/M025705/1, BB/M023818/1, BB/L005239/1, BB/M012557/1, BB/L009501/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [G120/1030] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Confident identification of sites of protein phosphorylation by mass spectrometry (MS) is essential to advance understanding of phosphorylation-mediated signaling events. However, the development of novel instrumentation requires that methods for MS data acquisition and its interrogation be evaluated and optimized for high-throughput phosphoproteomics. Here we compare and contrast eight MS acquisition methods on the novel tribrid Orbitrap Fusion MS platform using both a synthetic phosphopeptide library and a complex phosphopeptide-enriched cell lysate. In addition to evaluating multiple fragmentation regimes (HCD, EThcD, and neutral-loss triggered ET(ca/hc)D) and analyzers for MS/MS (orbitrap (OT) versus ion trap (IT)), we also compare two commonly used bioinformatics platforms, Andromeda with PTM-score, and MASCOT with ptmRS for confident phosphopeptide identification and, crucially, phosphosite localization. Our findings demonstrate that optimal phosphosite identification is achieved using HCD fragmentation and high-resolution orbitrap-based MS/MS analysis, employing MASCOT/ptmRS for data interrogation. Although EThcD is optimal for confident site localization for a given PSM, the increased duty cycle compared with HCD compromises the numbers of phosphorites identified. Finally, our data highlight that a charge-state-dependent fragmentation regime and a multiple algorithm search strategy are likely to be of benefit for confident large-scale phosphosite localization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available