4.7 Article

Performance Evaluation of the Q Exactive HF-X for Shotgun Proteomics

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 727-738

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00602

Keywords

bottom-up; shotgun proteomics; Q Exactive HF-X; DIA; DDA; phosphoproteomics; TMT

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF14CC0001]
  2. MSmed project - European Union [686547]
  3. Danish Cancer Society [R90-A5844 KBVU]
  4. Lundbeck Foundation [R191-2015-703] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research [PI Jesper Velgaard Olsen] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Progress in proteomics is mainly driven by advances in mass spectrometric (MS) technologies. Here we benchmarked the performance of the latest MS instrument in the benchtop Orbitrap series, the Q Exactive HF-X, against its predecessor for proteomics applications. A new peak-picking algorithm, a brighter ion source, and optimized ion transfers enable productive MS/MS acquisition above 40 Hz at 7500 resolution. The hardware and software improvements collectively resulted in improved peptide and protein identifications across all comparable conditions, with an increase of up to 50 percent at short LC-MS gradients, yielding identification rates of more than 1000 unique peptides per minute. Alternatively, the Q Exactive HF-X is capable of achieving the same proteome coverage as its predecessor in approximately half the gradient time or at 10-fold lower sample loads. The Q Exactive HF-X also enables rapid phosphoproteomics with routine analysis of more than 5000 phosphopeptides with short single-shot 15 min LC-MS/MS measurements, or 16 700 phosphopeptides quantified across ten conditions in six gradient hours using TMT10-plex and offline peptide fractionation. Finally, exciting perspectives for data-independent acquisition are highlighted with reproducible identification of 55 000 unique peptides covering 5900 proteins in half an hour of MS analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available