4.7 Editorial Material

Progress on the HUPO Draft Human Proteome: 2017 Metrics of the Human Proteome Project

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 4281-4287

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00375

Keywords

metrics; missing proteins; guidelines; neXtProt; PeptideAtlas; Human Proteome Project (HPP); long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs)

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health grants [P30ES017885-01A1, U24CA210967]
  2. NIH [R01GM087221, U54EB020406]
  3. SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  5. EU seventh Framework
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research 7-year Foundation Grant
  7. Canada Research Chair in Protease Proteomics and Systems Biology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) Human Proteome Project (HPP) continues to make progress on its two overall goals: (1) completing the protein parts list, with an annual update of the HUPO draft human proteome, and (2) making proteomics an integrated complement to genomics and transcriptomics throughout biomedical and life sciences research. neXtProt version 2017-01-23 has 17 008 confident protein identifications (Protein Existence [PE] level 1) that are compliant with the HPP Guidelines v2.1 (https://hupo.org/Guidelines), up from 13 664 in 2012-12 and 16 518 in 2016-04. Remaining to be found by mass spectrometry and other methods are 2579 missing proteins (PE2+3+4), down from 2949 in 2016. PeptideAtlas 2017-01 has 15 173 canonical proteins, accounting for nearly all of the 15 290 PE1 proteins based on MS data. These resources have extensive data on PTMs, single amino acid variants, and splice isoforms. The Human Protein Atlas v16 has 10 492 highly curated protein entries with tissue and subcellular spatial localization of proteins and transcript expression. Organ-specific popular protein lists have been generated for broad use in quantitative targeted proteomics using SRM-MS or DIA-SWATH-MS studies of biology and disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available