4.7 Article

Missing Value Monitoring Enhances the Robustness in Proteomics Quantitation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 1719-1727

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b01056

Keywords

missing values; proteomics; mass spectrometry; data-independent acquisition (DIA); data-dependent acquisition (DDA); missing value monitoring (MvM) workflow; cell cycle

Funding

  1. AIRC [IG14578, IG17490, 18188]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In global proteomic analysis, it is estimated that proteins span from millions to less than 100 copies per cell. The challenge of protein quantitation by clasSic shotgun proteomic techniques relies on the presence of missing values in peptides belonging to loW-aburidance proteini that Towers intraninS reproducibility affecting postdata statistical analysis. Here, we present a new analytical workflow MvM (missing value monitoring) able to recover quantitation of missing values generated by shotgun analysis. In particular, we used confident data-dependent acquisition (DDA) quantitation only for proteins measured in all the runs, while we filled the missing values with data-independent acquisition analysis using the library previously generated in DIDA. We analyzed cell cycle regulated proteins, as they are low abundance proteins with highly dynamic expression levels. Indeed, we found that cell cycle related proteins are the major components of the missing values-rich proteome. Using the MvM workflow, we doubled the number of robustly quantified cell cycle related proteins, and we reduced the number of missing values achieving robust quantitation for proteins over molecules per cell. MvM allows lower quantification variance among replicates for low abundance proteins with respect to DDA analysis, which demonstrates the potential of this novel workflow to measure low abundance, dynamically regulated proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available