4.3 Article

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH NURSING STUDENTS RESILIENCE: COMMUNICATION SKILLS COURSES, USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA AND SATISFACTION WITH CLINICAL PLACEMENT

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 153-161

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.006

Keywords

Nursing students; Israel; Personal resilience; Group resilience; Social media use; Communications skills course

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to explore the (a) associations between students' personal and group resilience to their utilization of social networking platforms and formally taught communication skills, (b) students' personal and clinical characteristics that are related to personal and group resilience and the perceived helpfulness of communication course, and (c) factors that contribute to students' satisfaction with their clinical placement. Data were collected from 149 second year nursing students learning in a major university in the country of Israel with the use of a self-administered structured questionnaire. Students' satisfaction from their clinical placement was measured using I open-ended question, analyzed through qualitative methods. Results demonstrated positive correlations between students' use of social networking to their personal and group resilience (P < .05). Moreover, social media use, religion, and clinical placement characteristics were related to resilience and to the perceived helpfulness of the communication course (P < .01). Students' satisfaction with their clinical placement was based primarily on the clinical instructors' personal and professional skills. In conclusion, social networking can and should be used as a learning tool to promote resilience among nursing students. Faculty and nurse managers should be aware of the central role of the clinical instructor and initiate collaborative and supporting initiatives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available