4.5 Article

Comparison of pressure-swing distillation and extractive distillation with varied-diameter column in economics and dynamic control

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 9-25

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2016.11.005

Keywords

Pressure-swing distillation; Extractive distillation; Varied-diameter column; Economics; Dynamic control

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21306093, 21676152]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pressure-swing distillation and extractive distillation are two common methods for azeotrope separation. The economics and controllability are two crucial factors for evaluating the feasibility of a separation process. A varied-diameter column (VDC) was used in the process design to evaluate its economics and controllability. Five azeotropic systems were investigated in order to compare the economics of pressure swing distillation and extractive distillation with a VDC. Results indicate that pressure-swing distillation with a VDC saves more money than extractive distillation. The dynamic control were evaluated in the acetone-methanol system for both processes with a VDC. The improved control structure for pressure swing distillation with a VDC can handle +/- 20% disturbances effectively, while the improved control structure for extractive distillation with a VDC can only handle +/- 10% disturbances. A comparison of the two methods from the viewpoint of economics and controllability demonstrates that pressure-swing distillation is more suitable when using a VDC. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available