4.8 Article

Core-shell yolk-shell Si@C@Void@C nanohybrids as advanced lithium ion battery anodes with good electronic conductivity and corrosion resistance

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 342, Issue -, Pages 529-536

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.094

Keywords

Core-shell structures; Dopamine Lithium storage; Silicon; Yolk-shell structures

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21403195]
  2. Technological and Higher Education Institute of Hong Kong Seed Grant Scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Yollc-shell Si@void@C nanostructure has greatly improved the low Li+/electron conductivity and buffered the huge volume variation of Si, whereas the surface corrosion and passivation of the Si yolks in electrolytes still limit the lithium storage capability. Herein, core-shell yolk-shell Si@C@void@C nanohybrids were proposed and successfully prepared for the first time. Compared with Si@void@C, the newly proposed structure introduced core-shell Si@C nanoparticles as the yolks instead. Such extra carbon shell can not only decrease the electrical resistance between Si yolks and hollow carbon shells but also effectively protect Si yolks from electrolyte corrosion, i.e., the formation of Li2SiF6 layers on Si surface confirmed by X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. As a result, the Si@C@void@C electrodes exhibited remarkably enhanced reversible capacity, cycling stability (similar to 1366 mA h g(-1) after 50 cycles at 500 mA g-1, with a capacity retention of -71% with respect to the initial reversible capacity of 1910 mAh g(-1) at 100 mA g(-1)), and rate performance (with a capacity retention of similar to 60% at 4000 mA g-1). This work shows the paramount role of the inner carbon shell of Si@C@void@C in limiting the electrolyte corrosion and probably improving the electronic conductivity. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available