4.8 Article

Lithium-ion battery aging mechanisms and life model under different charging stresses

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 356, Issue -, Pages 103-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.084

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery; Charging current rate; Charging cut-off voltage; Aging mechanism; Capacity degradation speed model

Funding

  1. National Key Technologies R&D Program of MOST [2016YFB0101800]
  2. Science and Technology Program of SGCC (Operation Safety and Interconnection Technology for Electric Infrastructure)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The charging time-consuming and lifespan of lithium-ion batteries have always been the bottleneck for the tremendous application of electric vehicles. In this paper, cycle life tests are conducted to reveal the influence of different charging current rates and cut-off voltages on the aging mechanism of batteries. The long-term effects of charging current rates and cut-off voltages on capacity degradation and resistance increase are compared. The results show that there exists a critical charging current and a critical charging cut-off voltage. When the charging stress exceeds the critical value, battery degradation speed will be greatly accelerated. Furthermore, battery aging mechanisms at various charging currents and cutoff voltages are investigated using incremental capacity analysis. It is indicated that charging current and cut-off voltage should be reduced to retard battery degradation when the battery degrades to a certain extent. The time when the loss of electrode material accelerates is taken as the crisis to reduce charging current and the time when the loss of lithium inventory accelerates is taken as the crisis to reduce charging cut-off voltage. Moreover, an experiential model quantitatively describing the relationship between capacity degradation rate and charging stresses at different aging states is established. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available