4.8 Article

Enhanced electrochemical performance of Li -rich layered cathode materials via chemical activation of Li2MnO3 component and formation of spinel/carbon coating layer

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 365, Issue -, Pages 68-75

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.077

Keywords

Li-ion battery; Cathode material; Li-rich layered oxide; Spinel structure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51402127, 51474037, 51474113]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20130522]
  3. Senior Talent Foundation of Jiangsu University [13JDG009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Li-rich layered oxides are promising cathode materials for advanced Li-ion batteries because of their high specific capacity and operating potential. In this work, the Li-rich layered oxide Li1.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13O2 (LMNC), is modified via a carbonization-reduction process (yielding the corresponding reduced compound denoted LMNC-R). Compared to the pristine oxide, LMNC-R delivers significantly enhanced initial discharge capacity/columbic efficiency, remarkably improved rate performance with an accelerated Li+ diffusion rate, and significantly increased capacity/voltage retention. The specific energy density and energy retention after 100 cycles increase from 378.2 Wh kg(-1) and 47.7% for LMNC to 572.0 Wh kg(-1) and 71.3%, respectively, for LMNC-R. The enhancement in the electrochemical performance of LMNC-R can be attributed to the synchronous formation of the oxygen non-stoichiometric Li2MnO3-delta component and to the carbon/spinel double coating layer in the material that resulted from the post-treatment process. Thus, the carbonization-reduction modification process can be used to tailor the structural evolution procedure and to suppress the metal ion dissolution of the Li-rich layered oxide during cycling. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available