4.8 Article

High-performance Li-ion Sn anodes with enhanced electrochemical properties using highly conductive TiN nanotubes array as a 3D multifunctional support

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 360, Issue -, Pages 189-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.111

Keywords

Titanium nitride; Nanotubes array; Electric conductivity; Lithium ion batteries; Tin anode

Funding

  1. Thousand Youth Talents Plan [128010]
  2. National Materials Genome Project [2016YFB0700600]
  3. Jiangsu Outstanding Youth Funds [BK20160012]
  4. Jiangsu Shuangchuang Program
  5. Nantong Fundamental Research Funds [GY12016040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High capacity electrodes are demanded to increase the energy and power density of lithiumion batteries. However, the cycling and rate properties are severely affected by the large volume changes caused by the lithium insertion and extraction. Structured electrodes with mechanically stable scaffolds are widely developed to mitigate the adverse effects of volume changes. Tin, as a promising anode material, receives great attentions because of its high theoretic capacity. There is a critical value of tin particle size above which tin anodes readily crack, leading to low cyclability. The electrode design using mechanical scaffolds must retain tin particles below the critical size and concurrently enable high volumetric capacity. It is a challenge to guarantee the critical size for high cyclability and space utilization for high volumetric capacity. This study provides a highly conductive TiN nanotubes array with submicron diameters, which enable thin tin coating without sacrificing the volumetric capacity. Such a structured electrode delivers a capacity of 795 mAh g(sn)(-1) (Sn basis) and 1812 mAh cm(el)(-3) (electrode basis). The long-term cycling shows only 0.04% capacity decay per cycle. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available