4.7 Article

CO2 sequestration characteristics in the cementitious material based on gangue backfilling mining method

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.03.005

Keywords

Gangue backfilling; Goaf; Carbon dioxide sequestration; Mineral carbonation; Cementious material

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51304207]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Key Laboratory of Coal-based CO2 capture and geological storage, China University of Mining and Technology [2016A03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing anthropogenic CO2 emission and global warming has challenged the China and other countries to seek new and better ways to meet the world's increasing need for energy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The overall proposition of this research is to develop a brand-new CO2 physical and chemical sequestration method by using solid waste of coal mining and cementitious material which are widely used for goaf backfilling in coal mining. This research developed a new testing system (constant temperature pressurized reaction chamber (CTPRC)) to study the effects of different initial parameters on mineral carbonation such as different initial water-binder ratio, initial sample porosity and initial carbon dioxide pressure. The experimental results show that the CO2 consumption ratio is 15%, 10% and 7% higher with relatively high initial water-binder ratio, initial sample porosity and initial CO2 pressure within 48 h. In addition, some physical and chemical evidence was found through the electron microscope scanning and XRD test to further explain the above test results. This proposed research will provide critical parameters for optimizing CO2 sequestration capacity in this cementitious backfilling material with forming agent. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available