4.8 Article

Solvent-free dry powder coating process for low-cost manufacturing of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 cathodes in lithium-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 352, Issue -, Pages 187-193

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.131

Keywords

Solvent-free; Lithium-ion battery; Cathode materials; NMC; Dry-powder-coated

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [1355438]
  2. Iraqi Government
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1125998] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1125998] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Office Of The Director
  6. Office of Integrative Activities [1355438] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a solvent-free dry powder coating process for making LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 (NMC) positive electrodes in lithium-ion batteries. This process eliminates volatile organic compound emission and reduces thermal curing time from hours to minutes. A mixture of NMC, carbon black, and poly(vinylidene difluoride) was electrostatically sprayed onto an aluminum current collector, forming a uniformly distributed electrode with controllable thickness and porosity. Charge/discharge cycling of the dry powder-coated electrodes in lithium-ion half cells yielded a discharge specific capacity of 155 mAh g(-1) and capacity retention of 80% for more than 300 cycles when the electrodes were tested between 3.0 and 4.3 V at a rate of C/5. The long-term cycling performance and durability of dry-powder coated electrodes are similar to those made by the conventional wet slurry-based method. This solvent-free dry powder coating process is a potentially lower-cost, higher-throughput, and more environmentally friendly manufacturing process compared with the conventional wet slurry-based electrode manufacturing method. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available