4.8 Article

The modelling of carbon-based supercapacitors: Distributions of time constants and Pascal Equivalent Circuits

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 345, Issue -, Pages 247-253

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.02.012

Keywords

Supercapacitor; Carbon electrode; Pascal Equivalent Circuit; Voltage rebound; Simscape; MATLAB

Funding

  1. EPSRC (UK) [EP/M009394/1]
  2. Electrochemical Vehicle Advanced Technology (ELEVATE)
  3. EPSRC [EP/M009394/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1115151, EP/M009394/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supercapacitors are an emerging technology with applications in pulse power, motive power, and energy storage. However, their carbon electrodes show a variety of non-ideal behaviours that have so far eluded explanation. These include Voltage Decay after charging, Voltage Rebound after discharging, and Dispersed Kinetics at long times. In the present work, we establish that a vertical ladder network of RC components can reproduce all these puzzling phenomena. Both software and hardware realizations of the network are described. In general, porous carbon electrodes contain random distributions of resistance R and capacitance C, with a wider spread of log R values than log C values. To understand what this implies, a simplified model is developed in which log R is treated as a Gaussian random variable while log C is treated as a constant. From this model, a new family of equivalent circuits is developed in which the continuous distribution of log R values is replaced by a discrete set of log R values drawn from a geometric series. We call these Pascal Equivalent Circuits. Their behaviour is shown to resemble closely that of real supercapacitors. The results confirm that distributions of RC time constants dominate the behaviour of real supercapacitors. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available