4.8 Article

The synthesis of Li(Co-Mn-Ni)O2 cathode material from spent-Li ion batteries and the proof of its functionality in aqueous lithium and sodium electrolytic solutions

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 342, Issue -, Pages 690-703

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.115

Keywords

Recycling; Lithium intercalation; Sodium intercalation; Aqueous rechargeable battery

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [11145014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several spent Li-ion batteries were manually dismantled and their components were uncurled and separated. The chemical composition of each battery's component was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Among several ways to separate cathode material from the collector, the alkali dissolution treatment was selected as the most effective one. After both complete separation and acid leaching steps, the co-precipitation method, followed by a thermal treatment (700 degrees C or 850 degrees C), was used to resynthesize cathode material LiCo0.415Mn0.435Ni0.15O2. Its structure and morphology were characterized by XRD, Raman spectroscopy and SEM-EDS methods. The electrochemical behavior of recycled cathode materials was examined by cyclic voltammetry and chronopotentiometry in both LiNO3 and NaNO3 aqueous solutions. High sodium storage capacity, amounting to 93 mAh g(-1), was measured galvanostatically at a relatively high current of 100 mA g(-1). Initial lithium intercalation capacity of 64 mAh was determined potentiodynamically at very high scan rate of 20 mV s(-1) (similar to 40 C). Somewhat lower initial capacity of 30 mAh g(-1), but much lower capacity fade on cycling, was found for sodium intercalation at the same scan rate. The differences in the Li and Na charge storage capability were explained in terms of ion rearrangement during charging/discharging processes. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available