Journal
DISCOURSE PROCESSES
Volume 56, Issue 7, Pages 485-495Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2019.1591885
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Most research in psycholinguistics relies on online measures such as reading time to inform and test theories of language comprehension. However, the value of offline measures such as question-answering performance is sometimes overlooked in sentence processing work. Consequently, psycholinguists do not yet understand how the tasks and measures used in online experiments might reflect the content of the representations that are formed by the subject and how our comprehension tasks might influence subjects' reading strategies. We begin this review by briefly discussing evidence that comprehenders often misinterpret language. We then consider some of the reasons why psycholinguists tend not to use offline measures of comprehension to evaluate competing theories of sentence processing and discuss the role of subject engagement and motivation. Finally, we explore what is currently known about the relationships among task, depth of comprehension, and reading measures.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available