4.8 Article

Catalyst evaluation for high-purity H2 production by sorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming coupled to a Ca/Cu process

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 363, Issue -, Pages 117-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.075

Keywords

H-2 production; Sorption-enhanced reforming; Steam-methane reforming; Combined calcium-copper cycle

Funding

  1. European Union [608512]
  2. Regional Government of Aragon (DGA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The operational limits of a commercial nickel-based catalyst under theconditions of a sorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming process coupled to a Ca/Cu chemical loop are investigated for high-purity H-2 production in a cyclic operation. The performance of the reforming catalyst is tested by means of a high number of oxidation-reduction-reforming cycles. After 100 oxidation-reduction cycles, this catalyst retains its exceptional reforming activity. The methane conversion values are close to the thermodynamic equilibrium under very demanding conditions: temperature between 500 degrees C - 700 degrees C and mass hourly space velocity of 8.8 kgCH(4) h(-1) kgcat(-1). After 200 cycles, the sample shows reduction in its reforming activity in line with a lower dispersion of the Ni species. Sintering of Ni nanocrystals is evidenced during the oxidation-reduction multi-cycles. The performance of the catalyst after 200 oxidation-reduction cycles mixed with a CaO-based CO2 sorbent is studied under optimal conditions calculated for the sorption-enhanced reforming process coupled to a Ca/Cu cycle (temperature of 650 degrees C, steam/methane ratio of 4, sorbent/catalyst ratio of 4 and space velocity of 0.75 kgCH(4) h(-1) kgcat(-1)). Remarkably, an equilibrium value over 92 vol.% H-2 concentration is achieved, highlighting this catalyst as a promising candidate for the next steps of the process development. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available