4.8 Article

Degradation of graphene coated copper in simulated proton exchange membrane fuel cell environment: Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 362, Issue -, Pages 366-372

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.041

Keywords

Proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC); Bipolar plates; Graphene coatings; Corrosion; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)

Funding

  1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Monash Graduate Education
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201408430168]
  3. MCATM (The Monash Centre for Atomically Thin Materials)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metallic materials are most suitable for bipolar plates of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) because they possess the required mechanical strength, durability, gas impermeability, acceptable cost and are suitable for mass production. However, metallic bipolar plates are prone to corrosion or they can passivate under PEMFC environment and interrupt the fuel cell operation. Therefore, it is highly attractive to develop corrosion resistance coating that is also highly conductive. Graphene fits these criteria. Graphene coating is developed on copper by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) with an aim to improving corrosion resistance of copper under PEMFC condition. The Raman Spectroscopy shows the graphene coating to be multilayered. The electrochemical degradation of graphene coated copper is investigated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at room temperature. After exposure to the electrolyte for up to 720 h, the charge transfer resistance (R-t) of the graphene coated copper is similar to 3 times greater than that of the bare copper, indicating graphene coatings could improve the corrosion resistance of copper bipolar plates. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available