3.8 Review

Failure of an engineered system: The gastrointestinal endoscope

Journal

TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 116-123

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.tgie.2019.02.001

Keywords

Ergonomics; Endoscopy; Repetitive strain injury; Risk assessment and management; Proactive; Interactive; Reactive

Funding

  1. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Olympus Endoscopic Research Award
  2. Cook Medical Career Development Award
  3. Pentax Research Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advances in endoscopic technology continue to expand the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, there have been no parallel advances in general endoscope design, and gastroenterologists are at risk for musculoskeletal repetitive strain injury due to the repetition, high forces and prolonged, awkward postures required to perform endoscopy. The current endoscope design lacks a consideration of human factors, and due to the high risk of injury, represents a failure of an engineered system. This review will focus on a risk assessment and management strategy for the gastrointestinal endoscope. Risk assessment is the identification of potential flaws in the system. Risk management describes the steps taken to mitigate these flaws. Three different approaches to risk assessment and management, proactive, reactive, and interactive risk assessment and management, will be reviewed as they apply to the performance of gastrointestinal endoscopy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available