4.6 Article

Mechanical, Dynamic Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Banana Fiber/Recycled High Density Polyethylene Biocomposites Filled with Flyash Cenospheres

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMERS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 200-213

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10924-017-0938-0

Keywords

Biocomposites; Fly ash cenospheres; Natural fiber; Recycled HDPE; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST) [SR/WOS-A/CS-91/2012 (G)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the preparation of Natural fiber-reinforced biocomposites based on Recycled High Density Polyethylene (RHDPE)/Banana Fiber (BF)/Fly ash Cenospheres (FACS) and aims to increase the economic value of these waste materials. Maleic anhydride grafted HDPE (MA-g-HDPE) was used as a compatibilizer to increase the dispersion of fibers into the polymer matrix as well as to increase the compatibility between the matrix and fillers. Variation in mechanical, thermal and dynamic mechanical properties with the addition of FACS in RHDPE/BF composites was investigated. It was observed that 7.5 wt% FACS, 30 wt% BF and 3 wt% MA-g-HDPE within RHDPE matrix resulted in an increase in tensile strength to 17%, tensile modulus to 188%, flexural strength to 38%, flexural modulus to 159% and hardness to 37% as compared with the RHDPE matrix. Significant enhancement in the thermal stability of the RHDPE/BF biocomposites was also observed in presence of FACS under thermogravimetric analysis. The morphology of the prepared biocomposites has been examined by using scanning electron microscopy. Dynamic mechanical analysis tests revealed an increase in storage and loss modulus of the biocomposite system. The use of such recycled material, agricultural and industrial wastes increased the properties of the final product suggesting their use to be a good alternative in the production of polymeric composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available