4.2 Review

Recent Advances in the Solution Self-Assembly of Amphiphilic Rod-Coil Copolymers

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART A-POLYMER CHEMISTRY
Volume 55, Issue 9, Pages 1459-1477

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.28517

Keywords

block copolymers; graft copolymers; morphological control; rod-coil; self-assembly

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21320102006, 51573091, 91527304]
  2. Program of the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [16JC1400703]
  3. Program for Eastern Scholar in Shanghai

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solution self-assembly of amphiphilic rod-coil copolymers, especially linear block copolymers and graft copolymers (also referred to as polymer brushes), has attracted considerable interest, as replacing one of the blocks of a coil-coil copolymer with a rigid segment results in distinct self-assembly features compared with those of the coil-coil copolymer. The unique interplay between microphase separation of the rod and coil blocks with great geometric disparities can lead to the formation of unusual morphologies that are distinctly different from those known for coil-coil copolymers. This review presents the recent achievements in the controlled self-assembly of rod-coil linear block copolymers and graft copolymers in solution, focusing on copolymer systems containing conjugated polymers, liquid crystalline polymers, polypeptides, and polyisocyanates as the rod segments. The discussions concentrate on the principle of controlling over the morphology of rod-coil copolymer assemblies, as well as their distinctive optical and optoelectronic properties or biocompatibility and stimuli-responsiveness, which afford the assemblies great potential as functional materials particularly for optical, optoelectronic and biological applications. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 1459-1477

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available