4.4 Article

Difference in environmental degradability between poly(ethylene succinate) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10965-017-1383-4

Keywords

Poly(ethylene succinate); Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate); Biodegradable plastics; Environmental degradability; Fungi

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K00608] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A chemosynthetic aliphatic polyester, poly(ethylene succinate) (PESu), was degraded by a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (P(3HB)) depolymerase in vitro. While P(3HB) exhibited good biodegradability in all environments, PESu hardly underwent biodegradation in a marine environment. To understand the difference in environmental degradability between PESu and P(3HB), we investigated the distribution of P(3HB)- and PESu-degrading microbes in various environments. PESu-degrading microbes were never detected in marine environments. PESu-degrading bacteria isolated from various environments in this study belonged to the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. Most PESu-degrading bacterial isolates could not degrade P(3HB), suggesting that PESu was not degraded by P(3HB) depolymerase in actual environments. In addition, all bacterial isolates that were screened for P(3HB) degrading activity from various environments in this study did not degrade PESu, suggesting that PESu does not induce P(3HB) depolymerase in their bacteria and P(3HB)-degrading bacteria are not involved in biodegradation of PESu in actual environments. Taken together, these results could be related with the low biodegradability of PESu in marine environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available