3.9 Article

Life Cycle Assessment of renewable filler material (biochar) produced from perennial grass (Miscanthus)

Journal

AIMS ENERGY
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 430-440

Publisher

AMER INST MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES-AIMS
DOI: 10.3934/energy.2019.4.430

Keywords

Miscanthus; slow pyrolysis; biochar; LCA; environmental impacts

Categories

Funding

  1. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence (ORF-RE)
  2. School of Engineering, University of Guelph

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biochar, a hydrophobic biomaterial produced from lignocellulosic biomass is a promising alternative to conventional filler materials. Although a variety of feedstocks have been analyzed for producing biomaterials to a limited extend, a complete LCA study of Miscanthus biochar is scarce. This study evaluates the life cycle of biochar produced from Miscanthus that is grown on the marginal land in Ontario, Canada. Life cycle environmental impacts are determined by using the SimaPro LCA software adopting the TRACI method. The global warming potential (GWP) of the life cycle of biochar is found to be 117.6 kg CO2 eq/t. Miscanthus cultivation (93.0 kg CO2 eq/t) is the main contributor in the life cycle of Miscanthus biochar followed by pyrolysis (23.3 kg CO2 eq/t) and transportation (4.8 kg CO2 eq/t). Miscanthus cultivation is also the main contributor to acidification potential and non-carcinogenic potential; however, transportation and pyrolysis are the hotspots in the case of eutrophication, smog and ecotoxicity, and carcinogenic potential, ozone depletion potential and fossil fuel depletion, respectively. The sensitivity analysis reveals that the environmental impacts decrease with an increase of Miscanthus yield. The study provides information on the life cycle environmental impacts of biomaterial which would facilitate in selecting environmentally favorable filler material to replace conventional filler materials to mitigate environmental impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available