4.4 Article

Assessment of aliphatic poly(ester-carbonate-urea-urethane)s potential as materials for biomedical application

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER RESEARCH
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10965-017-1296-2

Keywords

Poly(ester-carbonate-urea-urethane)s; Elastomer; Candida biofilm; Biocompatible polymers; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  2. European Union - European Regional Development Fund under Operation Program Innovative Economy - MARGEN [POIG.01.03.01-00-018/08]
  3. Medical University of Bialystok as part of RPOWP [UDA-RPPD.01.01.00-20-001/15-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selected mechanical and biological properties of biodegradable elastomeric poly(ester-carbonate-urea-urethane)s (PECUUs) point towards their potential to be applied as scaffolds in tissue engineering. Here we explore their medical applicability taking into account their hemocompatibility and cytotoxicity. The influence of the ester monomer (derivatives of adipic and succinic acids), as well as diisocyanate type (IPDI and HDI) on the investigated PECUUs properties is presented. The presence of aliphatic diisocyanates, cyclic IPDI or linear HDI, governs the adhesion of Candida cells to these polymers offering the possibility to control the biofilm formation on their surface. In comparison to the linear form, cyclic diisocyanates with pentamethylene succinate or adipate fragments had two to three times lower biofilm mass formation on their surface. Reduced hemoglobin release from red blood cells observed during incubation of tested polymers with human erythrocytes suspension indicates their potential biocompatibility with human tissues. PECUUs were also able to support the growth of human keratinocytes HaCaT on their surface when coated with collagen. In effect, IPDI derivatives might possess a high potential for use in biomedical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available