4.6 Article

Composite fermion state of graphene as a Haldane-Chern insulator

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 100, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.125428

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UMass Amherst

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene in the presence of a strong external magnetic field is a unique attraction for investigations of the fractional quantum Hall (fQH) states with odd and even denominators of the fraction. Most of the attempts to understand graphene in the strong-field regime were made through exploiting the universal low-energy effective description of Dirac fermions emerging from the nearest-neighbor hopping model of electrons on a honeycomb lattice. We highlight that accounting for the next-nearest-neighbor hopping terms in doped graphene can lead to a unique redistribution of magnetic fluxes within the unit cell of the lattice. While this affects all the fQH states, it has a striking effect at a half-filled Landau-level state: It leads to a gapless composite fermion state that is equivalent to the doped topological Chern insulator on a honeycomb lattice coupled to a Chern Simons gauge field. At energies comparable to the Fermi energy, this state possesses a Haldane gap in the bulk proportional to the next-nearest-neighbor hopping and density of dopants. We argue that this microscopically derived energy gap survives the projection to the lowest band. We also conjecture that the gap should be present in a microscopic theory giving the recently proposed particle-hole symmetric Dirac composite fermion scenario of the half-filled Landau level. The proposed gap is lower than the chemical potential, and is predicted to be parametrically separated from the Dirac point in the latter description. Finally we conclude by proposing experiments to detect this gap; the associated boundary mode; and encourage cold-atom setups to test other predictions of the theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available