4.5 Article

Chemically active colloids near osmotic-responsive walls with surface-chemistry gradients

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 29, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/aa5bf1

Keywords

self-diffusiophoresis; chemi-osmosis; Stokes flow; chemically patterned walls

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation (DFG) [TA 959/1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemically active colloids move by creating gradients in the composition of the surrounding solution and by exploiting the differences in their interactions with the various molecular species in solution. If such particles move near boundaries, e.g. the walls of the container confining the suspension, gradients in the composition of the solution are also created along the wall. This give rise to chemi-osmosis (via the interactions of the wall with the molecular species forming the solution), which drives flows coupling back to the colloid and thus influences its motility. Employing an approximate 'point-particle' analysis, we show analytically that-owing to this kind of induced active response (chemi-osmosis) of the wall-such chemically active colloids can align with, and follow, gradients in the surface chemistry of the wall. In this sense, these artificial 'swimmers' exhibit a primitive form of thigmotaxis with the meaning of sensing the proximity of a (not necessarily discontinuous) physical change in the environment. We show that the alignment with the surface-chemistry gradient is generic for chemically active colloids as long as they exhibit motility in an unbounded fluid, i.e. this phenomenon does not depend on the exact details of the propulsion mechanism. The results are discussed in the context of simple models of chemical activity, corresponding to Janus particles with 'source' chemical reactions on one half of the surface and either 'inert' or 'sink' reactions over the other half.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available