4.5 Article

Boron-doped diamond synthesized at high-pressure and high-temperature with metal catalyst

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF SOLIDS
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 224-237

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2016.11.020

Keywords

Boron-doped diamond; High-pressure high-temperature synthesis; Boron content; Superconductivity; Conducting diamond

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
  2. Hosei International Fund Foreign Scholars Fellowship program
  3. Program of the President of the Russian Federation [MK-6048.2015.3]
  4. Russian Scientific Fund [14-13-00795]
  5. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [14-23-01015-ofi-m]
  6. JSPS KAKENHI [16K05758, 26107532]
  7. Russian Science Foundation [17-13-00047] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K05758] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The boron-doped diamond (BDD) powder consisting of 40-100 mu m particles was synthesized at 5 GPa and 1500-1600 degrees C from a mixture of 50 wt% graphite and 50 wt% Ni-Mn catalyst with an addition of 1 wt% or 5 wt % boron powder. The size of crystal domains of doped and non-doped diamond was evaluated as a coherent scattering region by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and using small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), being >= 180 nm (XRD) and similar to 100 nm (SANS). Magnetic impurities of NiMnx originating from the catalyst in the synthesis, which prevent superconductivity, were detected by magnetization measurements at 2-300 K. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, the temperature dependence of the resistivity, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy reveal that the concentration of electrically active boron is as high as (2 +/- 1)x 10(20) cm(-3) (0.1 at%). To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest boron content for BDD synthesized in high-pressure high-temperature process with metal catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available