3.8 Proceedings Paper

Adversarial Learning on Heterogeneous Information Networks

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3292500.3330970

Keywords

Heterogeneous Information Network; Network Embedding; Generative Adversarial Network

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772082, 61702296]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0803304]
  3. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [4182043]
  4. Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) Academic Research Fund (AcRF) Tier 1 grant [18-C220-SMU-006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Network embedding, which aims to represent network data in a low-dimensional space, has been commonly adopted for analyzing heterogeneous information networks (HIN). Although exiting HIN embedding methods have achieved performance improvement to some extent, they still face a few major weaknesses. Most importantly, they usually adopt negative sampling to randomly select nodes from the network, and they do not learn the underlying distribution for more robust embedding. Inspired by generative adversarial networks (GAN), we develop a novel framework HeGAN for HIN embedding, which trains both a discriminator and a generator in a minimax game. Compared to existing HIN embedding methods, our generator would learn the node distribution to generate better negative samples. Compared to GANs on homogeneous networks, our discriminator and generator are designed to be relation-aware in order to capture the rich semantics on HINs. Furthermore, towards more effective and efficient sampling, we propose a generalized generator, which samples latent nodes directly from a continuous distribution, not confined to the nodes in the original network as existing methods are. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on four real-world datasets. Results show that we consistently and significantly outperform state-of-the-art baselines across all datasets and tasks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available