4.6 Article

Chemical and Lattice Stability of the Tin Sulfides

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 121, Issue 12, Pages 6446-6454

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12581

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC Programme Grant [EP/K004956/1]
  2. Japan Society of Promotion of Science (JSPS) [26.04792]
  3. Royal Society
  4. ERC [277757]
  5. SiSu supercomputer at the IT Center for Science (CSC), Finland, via the Partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe (PRACE) [13DECI0317/IsoSwitch]
  6. EPSRC [EP/L000202]
  7. EPSRC [EP/L000202/1, EP/K004956/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L000202/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The tin sulfides represent a materials platform for earth-abundant semiconductor technologies. We present a first principles study of the five known and proposed phases of SnS together with SnS2 and Sn2S3. Lattice-dynamics techniques are used to evaluate the dynamical stability and temperature-dependent thermodynamic free energy, and we also consider the effect of dispersion forces on the energetics. The recently identified pi-cubic phase of SnS is found to be metastable with respect to the well-known orthorhombic Pnma/Cmcm equilibrium. The Cmcm phase is a low-lying saddle point between Pnma local minima on the potential-energy surface and is observed as an average structure at high temperatures. Bulk rocksalt and zincblende phases are found to be dynamically unstable, and we show that whereas rocksalt SnS can potentially be stabilized under a reduction of the lattice constant the hypothetical zincblende phase proposed in several previous studies is extremely unlikely to form. We also investigate the stability of Sn2S3 with respect to SnS and SnS2 and find that both dispersion forces and vibrational contributions to the free energy are required to explain its experimentally observed resistance to decomposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available