4.6 Article

Synthesis of Onion-Like δ-MoN Catalyst for Selective Hydrogenation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 121, Issue 35, Pages 19451-19460

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05460

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016053019134356]
  2. Guangdong Innovative & Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2016ZT06C279]
  3. SUSTech start-up funds
  4. NSF of China [21473231]
  5. Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program [JCYJ20160530190842589]
  6. Scientific User Facilities Division, DOE-BES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthesis of base metal catalysts with well-defined structure and morphology is highly desired to achieve high catalytic performance for clean energy and green chemistry applications. However, in most catalyst synthesis, it is challenging to control structural manipulation at the nanoscale, especially for transition-metal nitrides, because they are often thermodynamically unfavorable at atmospheric pressure. In this work, we report a high-pressure approach for the formation of hexagonal delta-MoN nanocrystals with a unique onion-like morphology. The onion layers are made of stacked zigzag Mo-N shells associated with the (101) crystallographic plane. Impressively, the as-synthesized delta-MoN possesses intrinsic catalytic activities that are twice higher than the traditional MoS2 for hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene and more than five times higher in the selectivity to hydrogenation. The nitride is also highly active for selective hydrogenation of diverse nitroarenes to anilines at mild conditions. The enhanced catalytic properties are presumably attributed to the unique zigzag Mo-N bonding structure of the nitride. This work demonstrates that high-pressure synthesis is a viable approach to design and fabricate new and cost-effective transition-metal nitride catalysts for diverse hydrogenation applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available