4.6 Article

Computational Study of Y NMR Shielding in Intermetallic Yttrium Compounds

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 121, Issue 51, Pages 28454-28461

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10080

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. TU-D doctoral college (TU Vienna)
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [SFB-F41]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the magnetic shielding for solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) provide an important contribution for the understanding of experimentally observed signals. In this work, we present calculations of the Y NMR shielding in intermetallic compounds (YMg, YT, YTX, YT2X, YT2X2, Y2TB6, and Y2TSi3 where T represents various transition metals and X refers to group IV elements C, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb). The total shielding a of this selection varies by about 2500 ppm and correlates very well with the experimentally observed shifts except for YMg and YZn. These two simple compounds have a spike in the DOS at EF and a corresponding huge spin susceptibility which leads to the disagreement. It could be a problem of DFT (neglect of spin fluctuations), but we would interpret the discrepancies as caused by disorder which could be present in the experimental samples because disorder removes the spike in the DOS. The diamagnetic contribution sigma(o) (chemical shift) is by no means constant as often assumed when interpreting experimental metallic shifts and varies up to 1500 ppm, but still the dominating term is the spin contact term sigma(c). Although all compounds are metals, only half of them have a paramagnetic (negative) sigma(c) due to the reoccupation of the valence Y-5s electrons, while for others the large induced Y-4d magnetic moment induces a diamagnetic core polarization. In most of our cases, the spin dipolar contribution sigma(sd) is fairly small with vertical bar sigma(sd)vertical bar less than 100 ppm and often even much smaller except in a few very asymmetric compounds like YCo2Si2 and YRu2Si2 (sigma(sd) approximate to 320 ppm).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available