4.5 Article

Hydrogen Bonding versus π-π Stacking Interactions in Imidazolium-Oxalatoborate Ionic Liquid

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 121, Issue 29, Pages 7173-7179

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b05564

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation [KAW 2015.0417]
  2. Swedish Science Council
  3. Division of Chemistry, Directorate of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Science Foundation (NSF) [CHE-1461477]
  4. Division Of Chemistry
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1461477] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intermolecular features like hydrogen bonding and pi-type interactions play pivotal roles in stabilizing molecular structures in ionic liquids with planar rings and hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors. However, the delicate interplay among these interactions is complicated and depends on specific ion types. In this work, ab initio molecular dynamics simulations were performed to reveal competitive and cooperative characteristics among hydrogen bonding and pi-type interactions in a typical imidazolium oxalatoborate ionic liquid. Imidazolium rings take preferential on-top parallel orientations, leading to their particular pi-pi stacking distributions at short distances. Intermolecular interactions between imidazolium and oxalato rings are manifested by short-range on-top parallel orientations and in-plane hydrogen bonding interactions, promoting their parallel displaced offset stacking arrangements. However, on an intermediate distance scale, attractive Coulombic interactions between imidazolium and oxalato rings dominate and contribute to their perpendicular orientations. Spatial coordination patterns between intermolecular oxalato rings are balanced by repulsive electrostatic interactions and steric hindrance effects, leading to their tilted orientations in local environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available