3.8 Review

Halo Substructure Boosts to the Signatures of Dark Matter Annihilation

Journal

GALAXIES
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/galaxies7030068

Keywords

halo substructure; dark matter annihilation; indirect dark matter searches; subhalo boost

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17H04836, JP18H04340, JP18H04578, JP15H01030, JP17H04828, JP17H01101, JP18H04337]
  2. MEXT
  3. JICFuS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of dark matter substructure will boost the signatures of dark matter annihilation. We review recent progress on estimates of this subhalo boost factor-a ratio of the luminosity from annihilation in the subhalos to that originating the smooth component-based on both numerical N-body simulations and semi-analytic modelings. Since subhalos of all the scales, ranging from the Earth mass (as expected, e.g., the supersymmetric neutralino, a prime candidate for cold dark matter) to galaxies or larger, give substantial contribution to the annihilation rate, it is essential to understand subhalo properties over a large dynamic range of more than twenty orders of magnitude in masses. Even though numerical simulations give the most accurate assessment in resolved regimes, extrapolating the subhalo properties down in sub-grid scales comes with great uncertainties-a straightforward extrapolation yields a very large amount of the subhalo boost factor of greater than or similar to 100 for galaxy-size halos. Physically motivated theoretical models based on analytic prescriptions such as the extended Press-Schechter formalism and tidal stripping modeling, which are well tested against the simulation results, predict a more modest boost of order unity for the galaxy-size halos. Giving an accurate assessment of the boost factor is essential for indirect dark matter searches and thus, having models calibrated at large ranges of host masses and redshifts, is strongly urged upon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available