4.5 Article

Characterization of Nanocellulose Using Small-Angle Neutron, X-ray, and Dynamic Light Scattering Techniques

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 121, Issue 6, Pages 1340-1351

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11425

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation through the SusChEM program [DMR1409507]
  2. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Materials Research [1409507] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanocellulose extracted from wood pulps using TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical)-mediated oxidation and sulfuric acid hydrolysis methods was characterized by small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques. The dimensions of this nanocellulose (TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber (TOCN) and sulfuric acid hydrolyzed cellulose nanocrystal (SACN)) revealed by the different scattering methods were compared with those characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The SANS and SAXS data were analyzed using a parallelepiped-based form factor. The width and thickness of the nanocellulose cross section were similar to 8 and similar to 2 nm for TOCN and similar to 2 and similar to 3 nm for SACN, respectively, where the fitting results from SANS and SAXS profiles were consistent with each other. DLS was carried out under both the V-v mode with the polarizer and analyzer parallel to each other and the H-v mode having them perpendicular to each other. Using rotational and translational diffusion coefficients obtained under the Hv mode yielded a nanocellulose length qualitatively consistent with that observed by TEM, whereas the length derived by the translational diffusion coefficient under the Vv mode appeared to be overestimated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available