4.3 Article

An Optimised Compaction Process for Zr-Fumarate (MOF-801)

Journal

INORGANICS
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/inorganics7090110

Keywords

metal-organic frameworks; solid sorbents; shaping; gas separation; gas storage; water harvesting; zirconium

Funding

  1. European Union [663830]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/R01910X/1]
  3. Welsh European Funding Office (WEFO) through the Welsh Government
  4. EPSRC [EP/R01910X/1, EP/M028267/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We reported a systematic approach aimed at identifying the optimal conditions for compaction of MOF-801, a small-pore zirconium-based metal-organic framework (MOF) containing fumaric acid as the linker, that can be easily synthesised in aqueous medium. Pellets of the MOF were prepared by compressing the powder either in neat form or dry-mixed with binders (sucrose, polyvinylalcohol, polyvinylbutyral) under a range of pressures and for different times. The mechanical stability and durability of the pellets was tested by simple drop tests and shake tests, finding that addition of 5% of polyvinylbutyral was enough to produce highly resilient pellets that did not release significant amounts of powder upon cracking. The crystallinity, textural properties and CO2 adsorption performance of the MOF were successively assessed, observing the least change of the original properties in pellets compressed at 146 MPa for 15 s. Compaction at higher pressures impacted the performance more heavily, with no evident benefit from the mechanical point of view, whereas compression time did not have a relevant effect. The cyclic adsorption behaviour was tested, showing that the pellets retained as much as 90% of the CO2 working capacity, while displaying unaffected sorption kinetics, and 74% of the H2O working capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available