4.3 Review

The Effectiveness of Social Marketing Interventions to Improve HIV Testing Among Gay, Bisexual and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Systematic Review

Journal

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 2273-2303

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02507-7

Keywords

HIV testing; Social Marketing; Men who have sex with men; Systematic review; Mass media; Communications

Funding

  1. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
  2. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office (CSO) at the MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow [MC_UU_12017/11, SPHSU11, MC_UU_12017/12, SPHSU12]
  3. Steve Retson Project Social Marketing Campaign Advisory Group
  4. MRC [MC_UU_12017/11, MC_UU_12017/12] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HIV testing is central to biomedical HIV prevention, but testing among men who have sex with men remains suboptimal. We evaluated effectiveness of mass media and communication interventions to increase HIV testing and explored patterns between study type, internal validity and intervention effectiveness for the first time. Five databases were searched for articles published between 2009 and 2016 using standard MeSH terms. Eligible studies were quality appraised using standard checklists for risk of bias. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively. Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria; 11 were cross-sectional/non-comparative studies, four were pre/post or interrupted time series, three were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and one was a case study. Risk of bias was high. Five cross-sectional (two graded as high internal validity, one medium and two low) and one RCT (medium validity) reported increased HIV testing. Further work is required to develop and evaluate interventions to increase frequency and maintenance of HIV testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available