4.6 Article

Amorphous MnO2 surviving calcination: an efficient catalyst for ozone decomposition

Journal

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 18, Pages 5090-5099

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9cy01426h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21677179]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  3. Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong Joint Research Scheme [51561165015, N_HKU718/15]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2015B020236004, 2017B050504001]
  5. Special Project for Transforming Scientific and Technological Achievement of Sun Yat-sen University [38000-18843231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ozone pollution has aroused worldwide concern for its adverse impact on both the environment and human health. A series of MnO2 catalysts with different crystallinities were prepared for ozone decomposition. The crystallinity of MnO2 was regulated by varying the calcination temperature of an amorphous MnO2. The calcination temperature was confirmed oddly to have a significant effect on the morphology, the textural properties and the surface chemistry of manganese oxides. Both the pristine amorphous MnO2 and the one calcined at 300 degrees C (MnO2-300) exhibited superior catalytic activity for ozone decomposition owing to the abundant surface oxygen vacancies, large specific surface area, and high oxygen mobility, which were derived from the amorphous structure. FTIR and in situ DRIFTS experiments revealed that calcination generated the hydrophobic MnO2-300, which showed enhanced water resistant ability compared with the pristine amorphous MnO2, and significantly suspended catalyst deactivation. Moreover, the oxidation state of Mn slightly changed in the used MnO2-300, further maintaining the high activity. This work may broaden the horizons of designing catalysts with high stability and efficiency for ozone decomposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available