4.6 Article

Anisotropy of electronic stopping power in graphite

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.104112

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P020259/1]
  2. DiRAC funding from the Science and Technology Facilities Council
  3. EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Computational Methods for Materials Science [EP/L015552/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/P020259/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rate of energy transfer from ion projectiles onto the electrons of a solid target is hard to determine experimentally in the velocity regime between the adiabatic limit and the Bragg peak. First-principles simulations have lately offered relevant new insights and quantitative information for prototypical homogeneous materials. Here, we study the influence of structural anisotropy on electronic stopping power with time-dependent density functional theory simulations of a hydrogen projectile in graphite. The projectile traveled at a range of angles and impact parameters for velocities between 0.1 and 1.4 a.u., and the electronic stopping power was calculated for each simulation. After validation with average experimental data, the anisotropic crystal structure was found to have a strong influence on the stopping power, with a difference between simulations parallel and perpendicular to the graphite plane of up to 25%, more anisotropic than expected based on previous work. The velocity dependence at low velocity displays clear linear behavior in general, except for projectiles traveling perpendicular to graphitic layers, for which a thresholdlike behavior is obtained. For projectiles traveling along graphitic planes, metallic behavior is observed with a change of slope when the projectile velocity reaches the Fermi velocity of the electrons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available