4.8 Article

Na4Fe3(PO4)2P2O7/C nanospheres as low-cost, high-performance cathode material for sodium-ion batteries

Journal

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages 330-336

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.02.017

Keywords

Na4Fe3(PO4)(2)P2O7/C nanosphere; Low cost; Cathode material; Sodium-ion battery; High performance

Funding

  1. National Key Research Program of China [2016YFB0901500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875171, 21673165, 21333007]
  3. Science and Technology Project of State Grid [SGRIDGKJ[2017]841]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042018kf0007]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592383, 2017T100574]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sodium-ion battery is regarded as a promising power source for large-scale energy storage systems. However, the development of sodium-ion batteries is hindered by the lack of applicable cathode materials with low cost and long cycle life. Here, we report a successful synthesis of Na4Fe3(PO4)(2)P2O7/C nanospheres with tunable particle size and carbon coating thickness by a template approach. The as-prepared Na4Fe3(PO4)(2)P2O7/C nanospheres deliver a high discharge capacity of 128.5 mAh g(-1) (near to the theoretical capacity: 129 mAh g(-1)) at 0.2C, with capacity retention of 63.5% at 10 C after 4000 cycles. Particularly, a high reversible capacity of 79 mAh g(-1) is exhibited at an ultrahigh current rate of 100 C (charge/discharge in 36s). The excellent performances result from the shortened Na+ ion diffusion length within the nanospheres (similar to 30 nm) and highly conductive pathways for electrons in the carbon coating layers (similar to 3 nm). Owing to their low cost, long lifespan and outstanding rate capability, we believe that the Na4Fe3(PO4)(2)P2O7/C nanospheres are considerable competitive to other cathode materials for application in stationary sodium-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available