4.8 Article

Crystallographic characterization of Er2C2@C2(43)-C90, Er2C2@C2(40)-C90, Er2C2@C2(44)-C90, and Er2C2@C1(21)-C90: the role of cage-shape on cluster configuration

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 11, Issue 37, Pages 17319-17326

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9nr06466d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC [51672093, 51602112, 51602097, 21773181]
  2. JSPS [JP17H02735]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs), that is, fullerenes encapsulating metallic species, cage size is known to be an important factor for cluster configuration adoption; however, the impact of the cage shape on the cluster geometry fitting remains poorly understood. Herein, for the first time, four dierbium-carbide EMFs with C-90 cages, namely, Er2C2@C-2(43)-C-90, Er2C2@C-2(40)-C-90, Er2C2@C-2(44)-C-90, and Er2C2@C-1(21)-C-90, were successfully synthesized and fully characterized using a combination of mass spectrometry, single-crystal X-ray diffractometry, vis-NIR, Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopies, and cyclic voltammetry. In particular, the fullerene cages of C-2(43)-C-90 and C-2(44)-C-90 are crystallographically identified for the first time. Interestingly, the ErMIDLINE HORIZONTAL ELLIPSISEr distance of the major sites in Er2C2@C-2(43)-C-90, Er2C2@C-2(40)-C-90, Er2C2@C-2(44)-C-90, and Er2C2@C-1(21)-C-90 is 3.927, 4.058, 4.172, and 4.651 angstrom, respectively, which increases gradually with an increase in the major axis of the cage. Moreover, the bond length of the inner C-2-unit decreases progressively with an increase in the ErMIDLINE HORIZONTAL ELLIPSISEr distance, indicating that the inserted C-2-unit can serve as a molecular spring to support the strong metal-cage interactions within cages with the same size but different shapes. Hence, the role of cage shape on the cluster configuration is unveiled safely for the as-obtained Er2C2@C-90 isomers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available